Have you heard of the Dead Internet Theory? I just heard the term. It's a fascinating mix of observable facts and dystopian conspiracy. The factual part is that the vast majority of content on the internet is generated by AI and posted by bots. The conspiracy part is that some sort of centralized shadow rulers are instigating this to make the population docile. I'm not advocating that part, and I don't personally believe it. The incentives of flooding the internet with AI generated garbage are enough for it to happen without central planning. The interesting part of the theory is that theres so much low-quality trash on the internet, it is effectively dead.
I didn't have a name for it, but we have been working on a way to create an island of life in the ocean of dead content. Shortly after the first version of this site went live, I came across this video from Pursuit of Wonder. This is where I learned about the Dead Internet Theory, and why we use the word Spam to describe unsolicited crap. Truth be told, this video outlines the problems I am trying to solve better than I would. So If you want to know what problems led to the creation of 67 Stations, watch this video.
Here are some highlights from the video:
How are we trying to bring the internet back to life?Surprisingly, a dedication to a few simple principles can solve some of the biggest problems we face.
The power of these ideals become evident when we look at what happens in their absence on social media today. Algorithms are designed to show you content you didn't ask to see. Content from channels/people/pages you follow lightly trickles into your feed. Facebook asks content creator pages to pay for followers to see their posts, like an ad. It's called Organic Reach, and it doesn't work. Here is an article Facebook wrote about it over a decade ago: Organic Reach on Facebook It's not just Facebook. And it's not just a nuisance. Artists that used to rely on social media to connect with their audience now have to pay an arm and a leg to reach them.
So that's some of the problems with not seeing the content you asked to see. What about the problems with seeing content you didn't ask to see? Ever hear the word "misinformation"? That's what happens when someone makes up a lie, usually a shocking and aggravating lie, and the algorithms shows it to everyone. Am I saying 67 Stations can get rid of misinformation? Of course not. But if you don't see content from bots and people you don't follow, the misinformation you see is what you choose to see. We all have that cousin or sibling or parent that shows the most ridiculous stuff. You know their posts are usually crap. You know what to do with their posts.
Before I get too carried away with explanation, let me share some of the fundamental beliefs behind 67 Stations. These help guide the decisions we make.
What we are and aren't trying to do
You deserve some clarity on what we aren't trying to accomplish here, lest you and everyone else imagine all the things you hate about social media or the internet and then feel let down when we don't do it all.